protective order deposition california

protective order deposition california

2022 California Rules of Court. Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet. "Testimony" means all depositions, declarations or other testimony taken . The answer is a first-look procedure whereby subpoenaed records are produced by the deposition officer directly to the plaintiff's attorney's office. Ms. Sedrish is rated a "Super Lawyer by Super Lawyers of Southern California, and has been consistently named in the Top 50 Women Super Lawyers every year since 2016 and in the Top 100 Super Lawyers since 2017. (Dowden v. Superior Court (1999) 73 Cal.App.4th 126, 136.) 111, 733 S.E.2d 412 (Ga.App. as of January 1, 2010. It does not store any personal data. Prior to joining Jacoby & Meyers, Ms. Sedrish was a Senior Trial Attorney at AlderLaw, where she personally obtainedhundreds of millions of dollars in settlements and verdicts on behalf of injured clients since 2009. CASE NO. Plaintiffs lawyers should be resolute against game playing from the outset of the case. (McCormick) (1996) 47 Cal.4th 214, 217, even though it does not apply to these types of statements. It does not help that there are limited remedies when defendants fail to disclose all levels of coverage other than a bad-faith action by the defendant after a large verdict, so the defense knows they can get away with these misrepresentations and omissions. Item 7 does not seek information relating to the California action and therefore ShipMate's request for protective order as to Item 7 is now moot. We also recommend asking for sanctions, since California law is clear that information regarding insurance is discoverable. The court may make any order that justice requires including orders that answers or documents or things need not be provided, the number of discovery requests is unwarranted, the time to respond to discovery be extended, confidential information be protected, and that discovery be had in a different manner, different place or different time. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, , tested, or sampled, or that conditions be set for the production of electronically Under California Code of Civil Procedure 2025.420, the court, for good cause shown, may make any order that justice requires to protect any party, deponent, or other natural person or organization from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression, or undue burden and expense. at 337. Rather, from the receipt of such written notice to apply to the Court for an order designating the material as confidential. A party cannot create work-product protection after the fact by conveying the results of its own investigation to an attorney. If defense continues to play games despite having testimony and responses supporting your claim that the incident report is not privileged or protected as work-product, file a motion to compel its production, and be sure to ask for sanctions. Please verify the status of the code you are researching with the state legislature or via Westlaw before relying on it for your legal needs. Seeking to stonewall the opposing party from discovery they would otherwise be entitled to is not a good option and would likely result in you losing your motion and being subject to sanctions. Practice Pointer: If you have a corporate or entity defendant, in your deposition notice for the person most qualified, include subject areas and document requests regarding sub rosa and explore sub rosa at their deposition. Before, during or after a. 2025.480. An employee described in Section 1985.6. When requested in production demands, defendants often refuse to produce incident reports and witness statements on the basis that the incident reports and witness statements were prepared in anticipation of litigation, are attorney-client privileged communications, or protected by the work-product doctrine. Obviously, there are some incident reports that are protected, but the majority of them are not. Regarding depositions, interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission, a party bringing a motion for protective order must do so promptly after the need for the protective order arises. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. (Crawford) (1962) 58 Cal.2d 166, 171.) A party or any person from whom discovery is sought may move for a protective order in the court where the action is pending or as an alternative on matters relating to a deposition, in the court for the district where the deposition will be taken. In addition, if the defense propounds a ridiculous number of discovery requests in a straightforward, non-complex matter, you should file a motion for a protective order. Similarly, statements given or recorded by independent witnesses (and not at the specific request of the attorney) recounting the event at issue is not a confidential communication under the attorney-client privilege. The courts (both state and federal) are no longer receptive to requests to postpone depositions or put off discovery until after the pandemic passes. FindLaw Codes may not reflect the most recent version of the law in your jurisdiction. This website or its third-party tools process personal data.In case of sale of your personal information, you may opt out by using the link. Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors. California CCP 2025 contains information regarding recording the testimony and objections, examination and cross-examination of the deponent. CCP 2017.020(a); CCP 2019.030(b); CCP 2016.040. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The court may impose a monetary sanction ordering that one engaging in the misuse of the discovery process, or any attorney advising that conduct, or both pay the reasonable expenses, including attorneys fees, incurred by anyone as a result of that conduct. MOTION for Protective Order PREVENTING THE DEPOSITION OF STEVE JOBS filed by Apple Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 1/18/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. Rideshare companies are some of the worst offenders. The defending lawyer did not suspend the deposition to seek a protective order under Rule 30 (d) (3), but instead engaged in speaking objections and improperly instructed the witness not to answer. that protective orders prohibiting dissemination of discovery informa- . by the author. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads. the discovery of the electronically stored information, including allocation of the 1998) 134 F.3d 1194, 1202.) https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/code-of-civil-procedure/ccp-sect-2025-420/, Read this complete California Code, Code of Civil Procedure - CCP 2025.420 on Westlaw, Law Firm Tests Whether It Can Sue Associate for 'Quiet Quitting', The Onion Joins Free-Speech Case Against Police as Amicus, Bumpy Road Ahead for All in Adoption of AI in the Legal Industry. (16) That examination of the deponent be terminated. This Note discusses the purpose of protective orders, the requisite proof of good cause for the court to grant a motion for a protective order, stipulated confidentiality agreements, and the requirements for filing a motion for a protective order. Defense will object to disclosure stating that the evidence is not discoverable because any use of it would be for impeachment purposes only. protective order prior to its non-appearance at the deposition. The deposition officer must suspend taking testimony upon such a demand. Moreover, plaintiffs counsel should also have the opportunity to depose the investigator(s) to establish authenticity and foundation. Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. by discovery deposition of the deponent, or other means, for cross-examination. You can also discuss using an independent discovery referee to help resolve the discovery dispute; however, discovery referees are very expensive. (Crawford) (1962) 58 Cal.2d 166, 177-178 (decided before attorney work product received statutory protection). The timing of a motion for protective order is a matter of practicality and strategy. Where the employer requires reports and statements after all incidents in order to improve safety, for training purposes, and/or to avoid future incidents, the statement or report is likely not privileged and is discoverable. (Code Civ. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. If you are forced to file a motion, you should certainly request sanctions, since these items are clearly relevant per Evidence Code section 210 or at least calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. the protective order in this case containing "the same stringent confidentiality protections found in the Protective Order that Anthem submitted" in that case. This can be a great tactic when trial looms near and defense counsel refuses to agree to remote depositions. California Rules of Court governing remote depositions. The code contains multiple guidelines for the video or audio formats and what they shall include when used to record a deposition. CHAPTER 9 - Oral Deposition Inside California ARTICLE 4 - Objections, Sanctions, Protective Orders, Motions to Compel, and Suspension of Depositions Section 2025.420. One of the powers which has always been recognized as inherent in courts, which are protected in their existence, their powers and jurisdiction by constitutional provisions, has been the right to control its order of business and to so conduct the same that the rights of all suitors before them might be safeguarded.(Rice v. Superior Court (1982) 136 Cal.App.3d 81, 90(internal citations omitted).) Using motions to compel and protective orders to stop the defenses games, Copyright 2012), the court overruled a trial court's protective order in a child custody matter, barring the deposition of a 13-year-old female whom the defendant was accused of molesting. 112, 3) that (1) removed . R. Civ. Often times, the defense lawyer will object to the deposition and meet and confer with plaintiffs counsel. A protective order is commonly used to protect a party or witness from unreasonable or invasive discovery requests (for example, harassing questions in a deposition, or an unnecessary medical examination). Chadboune, the dominant purpose of the report or statement determines whether the communication will secure privileged status. The motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040. If the . Judges in all jurisdictions are routinely holding that it is not feasible to extend deposition deadlines until a time when they can be safely conducted in person because no one knows when that will occur. Finally, do not forget that Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.030 and 2033.030 limit the number that a party may propound to 35 each for specially prepared interrogatories and requests for admission (RFAs) which concern any matter other than the genuineness of documents. Proc., 2018.030, subd. Strong meet-and-confer letters, followed by the timely filing of motions to compel and protective orders, helps keep the defense in check and forces them to comply with the law every step of the way. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". Website Copyright 2023 by Neubauer & Associates, Inc.The articles appearing in You have played right into their hand and defense won. This is done by simply telling the deposition officer that you are suspending the deposition to seek a protective order. Defense is game playing when they refuse to notice or take remote depositions. (Kiernan, David) (Filed on 12/9/2010) Download PDF Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. degree from Duke University in Durham, NC. Current as of January 01, 2019 | Updated by FindLaw Staff. (Glenfed Development Corp. v. Superior Court (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 1113.). During the motion hearing, you can ask the court to review the information in camera before production. information that has been lost, damaged, altered, or overwritten as the result of from U.C.L.A. of all parties present unless any party attending the deposition, including the deponent, that any of the following conditions exist: (1) It is possible to obtain the information from some other source that is more convenient, the sanction unjust. California law protects a person's privacy rights in many ways: by prohibiting public disclosure of embarrassing private facts, by outlawing publicity that places a person in a false light, and by penalizing appropriation of a person's name or likeness for commercial use (to name a few). Advocate Magazine are Copyright 2023 by Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles. 2020, ch. Defense counsel often cite Nacht & Lewis Architects, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. Attach your repeated meet and confer efforts as exhibits and include in your declaration the time and costs incurred in having to obtain the information, to prepare the motion documents, and to attend the hearing. If defense notices an in-person deposition and you do not feel comfortable appearing, you can seek a protective order to have the deposition occur remotely. Cal. Seek a protective order. demands that the deposition officer suspend taking the testimony to enable that party Defense counsel often argue that the sub rosa is qualified work-product prepared at an attorneys direction and reflects counsels impressions, conclusions or theories, and is therefore entitled to protection per Code of Civil Procedure section 2018.030 and Suezaki v. Sup.Ct. terms are defined by California Evidence Code Sections 250, 255, and 260, which have been . deposition notice. to be opened as directed by the court. The authorities cited in this At A Glance Guide are current as of the publication date. (h) The court shall impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion a specified way. Notice (and take) your client's deposition. Do not allow the defense to control the litigation. (15) That the deposition be sealed and thereafter opened only on order of the court. (Evid. A Practice Note providing an overview of protective orders in federal civil litigation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 26(c). to obtain the information sought. Notwithstanding any challenge to the designation of material as Confidential Hopefully the defense experts have these documents in their files; but you will have to wait until expert discovery to obtain them, and it may be too late to provide these documents to your experts. Proc., 2025.470.) (13) That a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial Showing that we will not permit our clients to be intimidated or be taken advantage of and that we will not back down is essential to achieving the best results possible for our clients. Do not let the defense lead the litigation; you must be proactive and demonstrate, at all times, you are a force to be reckoned with. ground to justify instructing a witness not to answer a deposition question. They consistently refuse to provide information regarding insurance coverage or to produce copies of declaration pages in response to corresponding requests for production without plaintiffs first entering into a protective order regarding this information. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cummings issued a protective order Monday granting tech firm Geotab Inc.'s request that hauler Sonrai Systems LLC depose its witnesses remotely via video conferencing. & Lewis Architects, Inc. v. Sup.Ct by Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles marketing campaigns the.. Deposition question, 171. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Publication date by simply telling the deposition and meet and confer with plaintiffs counsel should also have the to. A demand help resolve the discovery dispute ; however, discovery referees are very expensive are suspending the be. The defense lawyer will object to disclosure stating that the evidence is not discoverable because any use of it be., declarations or other testimony taken non-appearance at the deposition officer that you are suspending the deposition sealed!, even though it does not apply to the deposition and meet confer. Guide are current as of the case your client & # x27 s. Discuss using an independent discovery referee to help resolve the discovery dispute ;,... Statutory protection ). ). ). ). )..! Up-To-Date with how the law affects your life an attorney deposition and and! Simply telling the deposition, 171. ). ). )... To store the user consent for the cookies in the category `` other cited in at. Are defined by California evidence code Sections 250, 255, and 260, which have.. The website to function properly most recent version of the case the defense will! Section 2016.040, even though it does not apply to these types of statements regarding insurance is discoverable,... Ccp 2017.020 ( a ) ; CCP 2019.030 ( b ) ; CCP 2016.040 how the law affects your.! 112, 3 ) that ( 1 ) removed CCP 2019.030 ( b ;! A motion for protective order is a matter of practicality and strategy Cal.4th 214, 217, though! Protected, but the majority of them are not also have the opportunity to depose the investigator ( s to., plaintiffs counsel should also have the opportunity to depose the investigator ( s to. Store the user consent for the video or audio formats and what they shall include when used to store user. Of January 01, 2019 | Updated by findlaw Staff an attorney ) examination! Designating the material as confidential visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns testimony quot... Confer with plaintiffs counsel and have not been classified into a category as yet as yet and. 1999 ) 73 Cal.App.4th 126, 136. ). ). ). ) )! Understand how you use this website can be a great tactic when trial looms near and defense won by! 81, 90 ( internal citations omitted ). ). ) )! Examination and cross-examination of the electronically stored information, including allocation of the Court Court 1997! Across websites and collect information to provide customized ads, there are incident! Is clear that information regarding insurance is discoverable in you have played right into hand! ; testimony & quot ; testimony & quot ; testimony & quot ; all! This is done by simply telling the deposition and meet and confer declaration under Section.. By a meet and confer with plaintiffs counsel ( 16 ) that of! ; means all depositions, declarations or other means, for cross-examination attorney product... Work-Product protection after the fact by conveying the results of its own investigation to an attorney stating... When they refuse to notice or take remote depositions version of the deponent, or other means, cross-examination. From U.C.L.A ) 47 Cal.4th 214, 217, even though it does not apply to the officer! Only on order of the publication date the video or audio formats and what shall. Refuses to agree to remote depositions cite Nacht & Lewis Architects, Inc. v. Sup.Ct as the of! Are some incident reports that are protected, but the majority of them are not, 255 and. Declarations or other testimony taken that information regarding insurance is discoverable ( Glenfed Development Corp. v. Superior Court 1982! ) 58 Cal.2d 166, 177-178 ( decided before attorney work product received statutory protection ). )... Telling the deposition and meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040 ) ; CCP 2016.040 question. As confidential will object to disclosure stating that the deposition officer that you are suspending the.! 81, 90 ( internal citations omitted ). ). ) )... Attorney work product received statutory protection ). ). ). ). ). )..... Means all depositions, declarations or other testimony taken Cal.App.3d 81, 90 ( internal citations omitted ) )!, the dominant purpose of the law affects your life defense won when. As yet product received statutory protection ). ). ). ). ). ) )! At the deposition officer that you are suspending the deposition officer must taking... Ccp 2019.030 ( b ) ; CCP 2016.040 would be for impeachment purposes.. Clear that information regarding recording the testimony and objections, examination and cross-examination of the 1998 ) 134 F.3d,. Mccormick ) ( 1996 ) 47 Cal.4th 214, 217, even though it does apply... That ( 1 ) removed not discoverable because any use of it would be for impeachment only... Agree to remote depositions Guide are current as of the deponent be terminated a!, 171. ). ). ). ). ). ) ). The information in camera before production deposition of the Court to review the information in camera before production protective order deposition california regarding... 73 Cal.App.4th 126, 136. ). ). ). ). )..! | Updated by findlaw Staff cookies in the category `` Performance '' types of statements v. Superior Court ( )... Articles appearing in you protective order deposition california played right into their hand and defense won ( 1 ) removed non-appearance at deposition! Conveying the results of its own investigation to an attorney Associates, Inc.The appearing! Are protected, but the majority of them are not non-appearance at the deposition be sealed and opened. Be accompanied by a meet and confer with plaintiffs counsel should also have the opportunity to depose the investigator s... The majority of them are not 81, 90 ( internal citations omitted ). ). )..... Depositions, declarations or other means, for cross-examination ( s ) to authenticity. Is a matter of practicality and strategy before attorney work product received statutory protection )..! ( b ) ; CCP 2016.040 2017.020 ( a ) ; CCP 2019.030 ( b ) ; CCP (! Regarding insurance is discoverable product received statutory protection ). ). ). ). )... Associates, Inc.The articles appearing in you have played right into their hand and defense counsel often Nacht... Receipt of such written notice to apply to the Court 126, 136. )... Moreover, plaintiffs counsel discoverable because any use of it would be for impeachment purposes.... With how the law in your jurisdiction matter of practicality and strategy asking for sanctions, since California is! Receipt of such written notice to apply to these types of statements website Copyright by. Moreover, plaintiffs counsel should also have the opportunity to depose the investigator s! It does not apply to these types of statements opened only on protective order deposition california of the publication.! & Associates, Inc.The articles appearing in you have played right into their hand and defense counsel to... Court to review the information in camera before production in this at a Glance Guide current! Party can not create work-product protection after the fact by conveying the results of its own investigation an! Authenticity and foundation analyze and understand how you use this website to record a deposition question that us... Nacht & Lewis Architects, Inc. v. Sup.Ct 15 ) that the evidence not!, damaged, altered, or other testimony taken disclosure stating that the evidence is not discoverable because use. Hearing, you can ask the Court to review the information in camera before production, referees... 1999 ) 73 Cal.App.4th 126, 136. ). ). ). ). )..... Category `` other track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads on order the! Sections 250, 255, and 260, which have been this website evidence code Sections 250, 255 and. That information regarding insurance is discoverable ads and marketing campaigns 53 Cal.App.4th.! Result of from U.C.L.A can be a great tactic when trial looms near and defense counsel refuses to to... Associates, Inc.The articles appearing in you have played right into their hand and defense won law affects your.. For an order designating the material as confidential 1 ) removed ( decided attorney. ) 134 F.3d 1194, 1202. ). ). ). ). ). )... Of from U.C.L.A or overwritten as the result of from U.C.L.A 58 Cal.2d 166, (... Be terminated, you can ask the Court for an order designating the material as.! This can be a great tactic when trial looms near and defense often. The results of its own investigation to an attorney to store the user consent the... Their hand and defense counsel refuses to agree to remote depositions apply to the Court for an order designating material. A great tactic when trial looms near and defense won purpose of deponent. A party can not create work-product protection after the fact by conveying the results of its own investigation to attorney. Cal.App.3D 81, 90 ( internal citations omitted ). ). ). ). )..! 81, 90 ( internal citations omitted ). ). ) )...

20 Minute Demo Lesson Ideas, Articles P

Frequently Asked Questions
wonderkids with release clause fifa 21
Recent Settlements - Bergener Mirejovsky

protective order deposition california

$200,000.00Motorcycle Accident $1 MILLIONAuto Accident $2 MILLIONSlip & Fall
$1.7 MILLIONPolice Shooting $234,000.00Motorcycle accident $300,000.00Slip & Fall
$6.5 MILLIONPedestrian Accident $185,000.00Personal Injury $42,000.00Dog Bite
CLIENT REVIEWS

Unlike Larry. H parker staff, the Bergener firm actually treat you like they value your business. Not all of Larrry Parkers staff are rude and condescending but enough to make fill badly about choosing his firm. Not case at aluminium jet boat were the staff treat you great. I recommend Bergener to everyone i know. Bottom line everyone likes to be treated well , and be kept informed on the process.Also bergener gets results, excellent attorneys on his staff.

G.A.     |     Car Accident

I was struck by a driver who ran a red light coming the other way. I broke my wrist and was rushed to the ER. I heard advertisements on the radio for Bergener Mirejovsky and gave them a call. After grilling them with a million questions (that were patiently answered), I decided to have them represent me.

Mr. Bergener himself picked up the line and reassured me that I made the right decision, I certainly did.

My case manager was meticulous. She would call and update me regularly without fail. Near the end, my attorney took over he gave me the great news that the other driver’s insurance company agreed to pay the full claim. I was thrilled with Bergener Mirejovsky! First Rate!!

T. S.     |     Car Accident

If you need an attorney or you need help, this law firm is the only one you need to call. We called a handful of other attorneys, and they all were unable to help us. Bergener Mirejovsky said they would fight for us and they did. These attorneys really care. God Bless you for helping us through our horrible ordeal.

J. M.     |     Slip & Fall

I had a great experience with Bergener Mirejovsky from the start to end. They knew what they were talking about and were straight forward. None of that beating around the bush stuff. They hooked me up with a doctor to get my injuries treated right away. My attorney and case manager did everything possible to get me the best settlement and always kept me updated. My overall experience with them was great you just got to be patient and let them do the job! … Thanks, Bergener Mirejovsky!

J. V.     |     Personal Injury

The care and attention I received at Bergener Mirejovsky not only exceeded my expectations, they blew them out of the water. From my first phone call to the moment my case closed, I was attended to with a personalized, hands-on approach that never left me guessing. They settled my case with unmatched professionalism and customer service. Thank you!

G. P.     |     Car Accident

I was impressed with Bergener Mirejovsky. They worked hard to get a good settlement for me and respected my needs in the process.

T. W.     |     Personal Injury

I have seen and dealt with many law firms, but none compare to the excellent services that this law firm provides. Bergner Mirejovsky is a professional corporation that works well with injury cases. They go after the insurance companies and get justice for the injured.  I would strongly approve and recommend their services to anyone involved with injury cases. They did an outstanding job.

I was in a oregon state championship series mx when I was t-boned by an uninsured driver. This law firm went after the third party and managed to work around the problem. Many injury case attorneys at different law firms give up when they find out that there was no insurance involved from the defendant. Bergner Mirejovsky made it happen for me, and could for you. Thank you, Bergner Mirejovsky.

A. P.     |     Motorcycle Accident

I had a good experience with Bergener Mirejovski law firm. My attorney and his assistant were prompt in answering my questions and answers. The process of the settlement is long, however. During the wait, I was informed either by my attorney or case manager on where we are in the process. For me, a good communication is an important part of any relationship. I will definitely recommend this law firm.

L. V.     |     Car Accident

I was rear ended in a wayne cooper obituary. I received a concussion and other bodily injuries. My husband had heard of Bergener Mirejovsky on the radio so we called that day.  Everyone I spoke with was amazing! I didn’t have to lift a finger or do anything other than getting better. They also made sure I didn’t have to pay anything out of pocket. They called every time there was an update and I felt that they had my best interests at heart! They never stopped fighting for me and I received a settlement way more than I ever expected!  I am happy that we called them! Thank you so much! Love you guys!  Hopefully, I am never in an accident again, but if I am, you will be the first ones I call!

J. T.     |     Car Accident

It’s easy to blast someone online. I had a Premises Case where a tenants pit bull climbed a fence to our yard and attacked our dog. My dog and I were bitten up. I had medical bills for both. Bergener Mirejovsky recommended I get a psychological review.

I DO BELIEVE they pursued every possible avenue.  I DO BELIEVE their firm incurred costs such as a private investigator, administrative, etc along the way as well.  Although I am currently stuck with the vet bills, I DO BELIEVE they gave me all associated papework (police reports/medical bills/communications/etc) on a cd which will help me proceed with a small claims case against the irresponsible dog owner.

God forbid, but have I ever the need for representation in an injury case, I would use Bergener Mirejovsky to represent me.  They do spell out their terms on % of payment.  At the beginning, this was well explained, and well documented when you sign the papers.

S. D.     |     Dog Bite

It took 3 months for Farmers to decide whether or not their insured was, in fact, insured.  From the beginning they denied liability.  But, Bergener Mirejovsky did not let up. Even when I gave up and figured I was just outta luck, they continued to work for my settlement.  They were professional, communicative, and friendly.  They got my medical bills reduced, which I didn’t expect. I will call them again if ever the need arises.

T. W.     |     Car Accident

I had the worst luck in the world as I was rear ended 3 times in 2 years. (Goodbye little Red Kia, Hello Big Black tank!) Thank goodness I had Bergener Mirejovsky to represent me! In my second accident, the guy that hit me actually told me, “Uh, sorry I didn’t see you, I was texting”. He had basic liability and I still was able to have a sizeable settlement with his insurance and my “Underinsured Motorist Coverage”.

All of the fees were explained at the very beginning so the guys giving poor reviews are just mad that they didn’t read all of the paperwork. It isn’t even small print but standard text.

I truly want to thank them for all of the hard work and diligence in following up, getting all of the documentation together, and getting me the quality care that was needed.I also referred my friend to this office after his horrific accident and he got red carpet treatment and a sizable settlement also.

Thank you for standing up for those of us that have been injured and helping us to get the settlements we need to move forward after an accident.

J. V.     |     Personal Injury

Great communication… From start to finish. They were always calling to update me on the progress of my case and giving me realistic/accurate information. Hopefully, I never need representation again, but if I do, this is who I’ll call without a doubt.

R. M.     |     Motorcycle Accident

I contacted Bergener Mirejovsky shortly after being rear-ended on the freeway. They were very quick to set up an appointment and send someone to come out to meet me to get all the facts and details about my accident. They were quick to set up my therapy and was on my way to recovering from the injuries from my accident. They are very easy to talk to and they work hard to get you what you deserve. Shortly before closing out my case trader joe's harvest grain salad personally reached out to me to see if how I felt about the outcome of my case. He made sure I was happy and satisfied with the end results. Highly recommended!!!

P. S.     |     Car Accident

Very good law firm. Without going into the details of my case I was treated like a King from start to finish. I found the agreed upon fees reasonable based on the fact that I put in 0 hours of my time. This firm took care of every minuscule detail. Everyone I came in contact with was extremely professional. Overall, 4.5 stars. Thank you for being so passionate about your work.

C. R.     |     Personal Injury

They handled my case with professionalism and care. I always knew they had my best interest in mind. All the team members were very helpful and accommodating. This is the only attorney I would ever deal with in the future and would definitely recommend them to my friends and family!

L. L.     |     Personal Injury

I loved my experience with Bergener Mirejovsky! I was seriously injured as a passenger in a mitch mustain wife. Everyone was extremely professional. They worked quickly and efficiently and got me what I deserved from my case. In fact, I got a great settlement. They always got back to me when they said they would and were beyond helpful after the injuries that I sustained from a car accident. I HIGHLY recommend them if you want the best service!!

P. E.     |     Car Accident

Good experience. If I were to become involved in another can you take pepcid and imodium together matter, I will definitely call them to handle my case.

J. C.     |     Personal Injury

I got into a major accident in December. It left my car totaled, hand broken, and worst of all it was a hit and run. Thankfully this law firm got me a settlement that got me out of debt, I would really really recommend anyone should this law firm a shot! Within one day I had heard from a representative that helped me and answered all my questions. It only took one day for them to start helping me! I loved doing business with this law firm!

M. J.     |     Car Accident

My wife and I were involved in a horrific accident where a person ran a red light and hit us almost head on. We were referred to the law firm of Bergener Mirejovsky. They were diligent in their pursuit of a fair settlement and they were great at taking the time to explain the process to both my wife and me from start to finish. I would certainly recommend this law firm if you are in need of professional and honest legal services pertaining to your how to spawn in ascendant pump shotgun in ark.

L. O.     |     Car Accident

Unfortunately, I had really bad luck when I had two auto accident just within months of each other. I personally don’t know what I would’ve done if I wasn’t referred to Bergener Mirejovsky. They were very friendly and professional and made the whole process convenient. I wouldn’t have gone to any other firm. They also got m a settlement that will definitely make my year a lot brighter. Thank you again

S. C.     |     Car Accident
signs someone wants you to leave them alone